Skip to content
§ GovRAMP

GovRAMP readiness for vendors selling into state and local government.

GovRAMP gives SLED buyers a common cloud-security verification path. SentrIQ helps teams organize evidence, tighten documentation, and reduce the package rework that usually slows a Ready or Authorized motion.

§ What it is

A common cloud-security path for state, local, tribal, and education buyers.

GovRAMP, formerly StateRAMP, is a nonprofit verification program for public-sector cloud adoption outside the federal market. It is modeled after the FedRAMP idea of standardization and reuse, but aimed at SLED organizations and the vendors selling into them.

The value is straightforward. Instead of repeating the same security review for every state or local buyer, vendors can work toward a common evidence and assessment path that multiple governments recognize.

Built on NIST 800-53

GovRAMP says it is based on the current version of NIST SP 800-53, the same publication used to establish FedRAMP. That makes the control language familiar to teams already operating in public-sector security programs.

More than one verified status

The Authorized Product List includes Core, Ready, Provisionally Authorized, and Authorized offerings, plus progressing statuses for products still moving toward verification.

Independent assessment still matters

GovRAMP relies on third-party assessment work and PMO review. The program is meant to reduce duplicated buyer reviews, not to remove the need for evidence and independent validation.

The government footprint is broadening

GovRAMP publishes participating governments and public educational institutions across states, local governments, tribal organizations, K-12, and higher education. The market is broader than the old StateRAMP label suggested.

§ How teams usually approach it

Use existing public-sector work without pretending it is the same program.

GovRAMP is not just FedRAMP with a name change. But if your team already has structured federal work underway, you should be able to reuse more of it instead of rebuilding the package from zero.

  1. Start with the right target status

    GovRAMP uses multiple statuses and impact levels, so the right entry point depends on your buyers and the maturity of the product. Not every team needs to force an Authorized motion on day one.

  2. Use Fast Track when federal work already exists

    GovRAMP's Ready process includes a Fast Track path for offerings that already have a federal authorization or are pursuing one. That can reduce duplicate packaging work if the evidence is organized well.

  3. Keep the package readable for PMO and buyer review

    Even when evidence exists, the value is lost if reviewers cannot follow the boundary, the inherited services, and the support for each control claim. That is the documentation problem SentrIQ is aimed at.

  4. Stay current after status is achieved

    GovRAMP ties verified status to continuous monitoring activity. Teams that keep the documentation and evidence trail current avoid turning every renewal or expansion motion into another cleanup project.

§ GovRAMP FAQ

Common questions about GovRAMP.

FedRAMP is the federal cloud authorization path. GovRAMP is the parallel verification path aimed at state, local, tribal, and educational organizations.

Both are rooted in NIST 800-53 and third-party review. The difference is the buying ecosystem and the program structure. If your buyers are federal agencies, FedRAMP is the direct route. If your buyers are in the SLED market, GovRAMP is usually the closer fit.

§ Related paths

Other public-sector paths teams often compare.

§ Next step

Selling into state and local government?

30 minutes. We will talk through your target market, your evidence posture, and whether GovRAMP is the right path to prioritize.

No hard sell. If the fit is wrong, we will say so.